Quarvio vs Lusha: honest comparison for cold email list buyers
Lusha credits cover email AND phone - 400 credits on Pro isn't 400 emails, and getting 5,000 emails takes 12+ months of subscription.
TL;DR — 5 things to know
- •Lusha charges ~$624 for 5,000 contacts vs Quarvio’s $129 — you save 79%
- •Credit model: Email AND phone share the same credits
- •Starter credits: 400 credits/month (email + phone combined)
- •Monthly price (Starter): $49.90/month
- •Credits cover email only - no phone credits burned on contacts you didn't want
Our take
Lusha's Chrome extension is genuinely the best single-contact LinkedIn enrichment tool available for SDRs doing targeted account-based work. The direct dial coverage for North American and European contacts is strong, and the CRM sync to Salesforce and HubSpot is well-executed.
The model breaks down for bulk email list building. Lusha credits cover both email and phone lookups from the same pool, so if you only need email addresses, you are still consuming credits at the same rate as someone who needs phone numbers too. The Starter plan offers 400 credits per month — 400 combined email and phone lookups — making bulk list assembly an exercise in months-long accumulation rather than a deliverable.
Price comparison
Starter $49.90 x 12.5mo at 400 credits/mo
Starter $49.90 x 25mo at 400 credits/mo
Starter $49.90 x 62.5mo at 400 credits/mo
Pro $339.90 x 20mo at 3,000 credits/mo
Quarvio: one-time purchase, valid 12 months, pre-verified before delivery. Lusha pricing verified against their live pricing page, 2026.
Feature comparison
Where Quarvio wins
- ✓Credits cover email only - no phone credits burned on contacts you didn't want
- ✓79-90% cheaper for bulk email lists
- ✓No per-seat pricing - one order covers your whole team
- ✓Built for bulk delivery - Lusha is built for individual rep lookups
- ✓One-time purchase vs monthly subscription
Where Lusha wins
- ✓Best LinkedIn Chrome extension for individual rep prospecting
- ✓Phone number coverage - direct dials alongside emails
- ✓Clean CRM sync to Salesforce and HubSpot
- ✓Fast single-contact lookups - ideal for targeted ABM
- ✓Strong North American and European database coverage
Key facts about Lusha
Source: Lusha pricing page, verified June 2026
Source: Lusha pricing page, verified June 2026
Source: Lusha pricing page, verified June 2026
“Lusha is great when you're doing targeted ABM and need the phone number for high-value accounts. For building a list of 3,000 mid-market CFOs? At 400 credits a month, that's 7.5 months of Lusha subscription. Completely impractical.”
— u/accountexec_pro · r/sales · 224 upvotes
Verdict: cold email list buyers
Lusha is excellent for SDRs doing targeted, account-based prospecting one contact at a time - especially when phone numbers matter. For bulk filtered email lists across thousands of companies, the per-seat credit model becomes prohibitively expensive and slow.
Frequently asked questions
How do Lusha's credits work for email-only use cases?
Lusha credits are consumed for each contact lookup regardless of whether you need email, phone, or both. One credit returns all available data for a contact — email and direct dial if available. If you only need email addresses, you are still consuming credits at the same per-contact rate as phone number users. The 400 credits/month on Starter translates to 400 emails maximum per month.
What is Lusha's database coverage for India and GCC?
Lusha's database is strongest in North America and Western Europe. India and GCC coverage exists but is thin compared to US and UK markets. For India-focused list building, purpose-built India databases have significantly better coverage of local companies and decision-makers.
Does Lusha offer a team plan?
Lusha offers team plans, but they are per-seat with a minimum seat count. Each seat adds to the monthly cost, and credits are shared across the team. For a team of 5 SDRs, the per-seat cost compounds quickly. Teams needing bulk contact lists for campaigns are better served by a delivery model where one purchase covers the whole team.
What makes Lusha different from Apollo for prospecting?
Lusha's Chrome extension focuses on LinkedIn and website profiles for individual contact lookups. Apollo has a larger database and built-in sequencing. Lusha is stronger for SDRs doing targeted ABM one contact at a time with a focus on direct dials. Apollo is better for volume prospecting with built-in sequencing. Both use monthly subscription models with per-seat pricing.
Is Lusha accurate for cold email campaigns?
Lusha claims 81%+ data accuracy. Independent reviews suggest accuracy is better for US and UK contacts than for European or Asian markets. Direct dials are generally more accurate than general contact data. For cold email verification specifically, running an exported Lusha list through a dedicated verifier before sending is still recommended.
Switch from Lusha today
Verified B2B contacts from $129 for 5,000. One-time purchase, 12 months valid, 90%+ deliverability guaranteed. No subscription, no seat limits.